TOBACCO TAX HIKE NEEDS EFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATION, STRICT ENFORCEMENT- CISLAC
By Salami Abdulrahaman| Pan Afric Reporters
The Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC), says the increased taxation on tobacco products without effective administration, transparent revenue collection, monitoring and enforcement will have limited impact.
The summit, themed: “Advancing Tobacco Tax Justice for Health, Equity and National Development”, brought together government representatives, civil society organisations, public health experts, researchers and development partners to examine Nigeria’s tobacco taxation framework.
Auwal Rafsanjani, Executive Director, CISLAC, disclosed this at the Second National Tobacco Tax Summit organised by the CISLAC in Abuja on Wednesday.
According to him, government must strengthen measures against tax evasion, illicit trade, under-declaration and other abuses in the tobacco sector.
A strong tobacco tax policy on paper means very little if enforcement is weak, revenue administration is opaque and powerful interests are allowed to undermine implementation.
“Nigeria, therefore, needs more than higher taxes. We need effective administration, transparent revenue collection, strong monitoring, tougher enforcement and credible sanctions against tax evasion, illicit trade, under-declaration and other abuses.
“CISLAC also believes that accountability must be at the heart of tobacco taxation. Nigerians have a right to know how tobacco taxes are designed.
How much revenue is generated, whether companies are fully complying, what sanctions are imposed when violations occur and how government ensures that public health remains the overriding consideration,” Rafsanjani said.
He said tobacco taxation should be viewed not only as a revenue generator but also as a public health intervention and a tool for protecting citizens.
The CISLAC official said higher taxes could make tobacco products less affordable and help reduce consumption, particularly among children and young people.
Rafsanjani further urged stronger safeguards against undue industry influence in public health policymaking.
He called for stronger coordination among the Federal Ministries of Finance and Health, Nigeria Revenue Service, Nigeria Customs Service, National Assembly, regulatory institutions, civil society, researchers and other stakeholders.
On her part, Mrs Sarah Bwala, Assistant Director, Federal Ministry of Finance, said the government had launched a new tobacco tax regime covering 2026 to 2028, with progressive increases in specific excise tax rates on tobacco products.
Bwala, who represented the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Mr Taiwo Oyedele, said the new regime represented another step in the government’s efforts to strengthen fiscal policy and achieve public health objectives.
implementation of tobacco tax policy required continuous consultation, sound empirical evidence and collaboration among relevant stakeholders.
She said the ministry expected deliberations at the summit to provide useful insights into the new regime and its potential impact on tobacco control, government revenue, industry operations and the wider economy.
The ministry, she added, remained committed to fiscal policies that were equitable, efficient and responsive to the developmental needs of the country.
Similarly, Comptroller Abubakar Yunusa of the Nigeria Customs Service said tobacco control was not solely about revenue generation but also about protecting lives and safeguarding young people.
Yunusa called for collaboration among government institutions, the Customs Service, industry operators and civil society to strengthen tobacco control and tax administration.
He commended the organisers for providing a platform for constructive dialogue and expressed optimism that the deliberations would produce practical solutions that balance public health and fiscal considerations.
Participants stressed the need for stronger institutional coordination and sustained monitoring to ensure that tobacco tax policies translate into measurable public health and fiscal outcomes.
