Army Refutes Torture Allegations in Sokoto Detention Facility, Orders Probe into Soldier’s Death
By Onwe Wisdom, Pan Afric Reporters
The Nigerian Army has dismissed allegations of torture and maltreatment of detainees at its 8 Division Provost Group Detention Facility in Sokoto, describing the claims as false and misleading while confirming that an investigation is underway into the death of a detained soldier.
The response follows an online petition alleging abuse and negligence leading to the death of Lance Corporal Bala Hudu at the Giginya Cantonment facility.
According to a press release issued by the Headquarters 8 Division of the Nigerian Army and signed by Olaniyi Osoba, Acting Deputy Director of Army Public Relations, the Army said the allegations raised by Malcolm Emokiniovo Omirhobo were being addressed with facts and ongoing investigations.
The Army explained that the late soldier had been undergoing court martial since 2023 following a homicide case in Katsina State and had pre-existing health conditions, including hypertension and eye-related ailments, for which he received continuous medical care.
“The late soldier was under continuous medical supervision and had unrestricted access to his family and legal counsel,” the statement said.
It further disclosed that Lance Corporal Hudu was admitted to the Accident and Emergency unit on April 15, 2026, after presenting symptoms including headache, weakness, and rapid breathing.
“He was diagnosed with severe right lobar pneumonia and malaria… his condition deteriorated on April 17, leading to his untimely death,” the Army stated.
The military authority stressed that the death was likely due to complications arising from underlying health conditions, rather than any form of abuse.
Following the incident, the General Officer Commanding (GOC) 8 Division was said to have constituted an independent Board of Inquiry to investigate the circumstances surrounding the death.
“This process is ongoing, transparent and thorough, in line with military protocols,” the statement added.
The Army categorically denied claims of torture, intimidation, or reprisal attacks within the detention facility, insisting that its operations comply with both the Armed Forces Act and constitutional provisions on human dignity.
“Our detention facilities adhere to international standards ensuring the dignity and welfare of detainees,” it said.
The command also reiterated its zero-tolerance policy for human rights violations, warning that any personnel found culpable would face strict disciplinary action.
In a move to ensure transparency, the Army invited the petitioner and other interested parties to appear before the Board of Inquiry scheduled to sit between April 29 and May 10, 2026.
“We remain open to collaboration with independent bodies to ensure justice and accountability,” the statement noted.
The 8 Division reaffirmed its commitment to professionalism, human rights, and due process, urging the public to disregard what it described as “baseless allegations” and await the outcome of the ongoing investigation.
